tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post115810555558362729..comments2016-10-01T13:31:52.128-04:00Comments on A Birdhouse: ExistentialismWarblerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04981471190679866578noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158362575169345552006-09-15T19:22:00.000-04:002006-09-15T19:22:00.000-04:00well, I dont see much problem with the way I see t...well, I dont see much problem with the way I see them used here...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03977286524350175186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158349703360678362006-09-15T15:48:00.000-04:002006-09-15T15:48:00.000-04:00good to hear how you view the use of quotes, cause...good to hear how you view the use of quotes, cause I realize now I may be giving the wrong impression sometimes through my use of them. yikes!<BR/><BR/>RMRachelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00174952375062915671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158192577237821452006-09-13T20:09:00.000-04:002006-09-13T20:09:00.000-04:00That is very interesting, Dan. I have never thoug...That is very interesting, Dan. I have never thought about quoes like that. As I said above, to me it denotes a different/wrong definition of some word.Warblerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12398486232119373821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158127035868882102006-09-13T01:57:00.000-04:002006-09-13T01:57:00.000-04:00While the more recent Germans scholars (1850-prese...While the more recent Germans scholars (1850-present) are generally quite good with critical analysis of language, &c., they do not usually maintain very good doctrine. Many of Germany's scholars, e.g., Schleiermacher, Barth, Harnack, Bauer, Holtzman, Ritschl, Bultman, Scholz, et alii, tend to be rather weak on orthodox theology.J. K. Waltershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12245329543700830731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158113139001276452006-09-12T22:05:00.000-04:002006-09-12T22:05:00.000-04:00his point about the steadiness of carcasm should b...his point about the steadiness of carcasm should be taken to heart, though, sister. we P's and our quotations marks, eh Dan?!kalipayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10608316420127656841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32866891.post-1158111866686529622006-09-12T21:44:00.000-04:002006-09-12T21:44:00.000-04:00I wouldn't call it sarcasm. I use them more for e...I wouldn't call it sarcasm. I use them more for emphasis..and to sety aside words that are defined by those who use them in the wrong ways....<I>par example</I>....thier use of "spiritual" has NOTHING to do with the HS.Warblerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12398486232119373821noreply@blogger.com